49 : "ROB PETER TO PAY PAUL" IS NOT FOR ISLAM
The
above proverb indicates that you may rob one person
(say rich) for helping another (ex: poor person).
This type of practice looks similar to the communist
philosophy of Karl Marx that inspires forcible
takeover (without compensation) of factories and
lands from rich ownership for redistribution among
the poor. Islam does not agree with this theory
of 'end justifies the means' for obvious reasons.
Helping a needy person named A is good. You better
do that from your own resources. But you cannot
harm another person B for doing that. Harming
B for doing that is worse than simply not helping
person A. In this case helping person A (if done
through desirable way) is mostly an optional good
action.
But harming person B by robbing him of his legally
earned wealth is the worst category of prohibited
sin that cannot be compensated by the above optional
action. By way of example, if an eye doctor can
restore vision to an eye without damaging a good
one, then that makes medical sense, otherwise
not. In Islam, bad means or action is not justified
by a good end or intention as there is urging
that both your end as well as means should be
good in pursuit of divine pleasure.