24 : THE FAITH CRISIS AMONG SOME INTELLECTUALS
Worldwide,
we come across some intellectuals (scientists,
journalists, philosophers etc.) who do not seem
to be well-convinced about the existence of God
and potential benefits from His religious system.
Many of them claim themselves to be the standard
bearer of higher education, modernism, progressiveness
and so on. They seem to misguide people with the
idea that religion is the culture of uneducated
and lower class people. In order to prove this
idea to be wrong, we can refer to the following
points:
(i) Insufficient Education: The said intellectuals
are educated but not so much educated as is needed
to have full grasp of the mysteries of the Universe
and its Creator. Let us take examples of the two
most intelligent scientists the world have ever
produced. One is Isaac Newton (1642-1727) who
was "intensely religious" despite being
the best of scientists for centuries. Another
is Albert Einstein who was the greatest scientist
of the 20th century and we do not know anyone
who can outshine him in the field of physics during
this period. While thinking out his Theory of
Relativity, Einstein was amazed for the vastness
of this Universe and greatness of its Creator.
He therefore accepted God as the "Highest
Wisdom" and commented "Science without
religion is lame and religion without science
is blind". Based on these two glorious examples,
we can realistically assume that your Faith should
increase rather than decrease with expansion of
knowledge. If that does not happen, then we would
probably be right in placing blame on your insufficient
knowledge about the Universe.
(ii) Improper Education: Not only amount
of knowledge/intelligence but also the type of
education also works behind the faith crises of
the so-called intellectuals. In the prime of their
life, many of them got fact-distorting education
like Darwin's theory of human evolution, Big Bang
theory about the origin of the Universe etc. These
lessons formed a layer on their mind that was
so permanent that could not erased by any moral
or fact-based education subsequently received
by them.
(25) Islamic Policy toward Animals: The
mainstream non-Islamic culture often shows kindness
to animals to the extent of caring pets like dogs,
cats etc. as dearly as or more dearly than own
children. This is linked to the following problems.
(a) Health hazards: Close contact with
such animals such as through kissing, hugging
or fondling pets can become good reasons for many
health problems like rabies, plague, bites etc.
Through cleanliness and vaccination, these health
hazards can be minimized but their total elimination
is almost impossible. Particularly the risk of
animal bites is always there as the animals fall
short of rationality of human beings
(b) Humanitarian issue: If you let your
pet share your soft bed and eat rich food from
your dining table, then you may feel in your good
conscience a lack of humanitarian matching with
thousands of homeless people in the developed
countries and millions of starving people in the
developing nations. This is an example of denying
rightful place to the dignified men while giving
their honorable place to lowly animals. Of course
you may argue that you yourself cannot eliminate
the poverty of society at large and that animals
are often more trustworthy than man. However,
fairness dictates that you leave the animals in
their rightful place, treating them with reasonable
kindness while doing your best to better the condition
of your fellow human beings.
The animal policy of Islam duly emphasizes on
both kindness to the animals and protection of
human interest. It honors man as the best of creations
and secures its place higher above the animals.
At the same time it does not forget to be kind
to the animals. Now follows an analysis about
this:
(i) Animals for human benefits: The Quran
reveals that God created the animals for benefits
of man so that they remember Him with gratitude
(36:71). For example, the animals are the sources
of our food (meat and milk), clothes (skin and
far), guard (dog watch), transport (horse and
camel etc.), pleasure (in zoo) etc. Man can lawfully
obtain some of these benefits by necessarily slaughtering
them. Like the vegetarians, Islam does not want
you to go without protein-rich delicious animal
food. It recognizes the food chain theory of biology
that one animal is the food for another which
is good for natural balance of animal kingdom.
(ii) Reasonable kindness to the animals:
You are not allowed to inflict unnecessary cruelty
upon the animals while using them to your benefits.
The Prophet, for example, warned against using
a blunt knife while slaughtering an animal for
food. Similarly, you cannot unnecessarily kill
an animal, beat up innocent pets or starve them.
(iii) Defense from animals: Kindness to
the animals is second to the safety of men. Islam
wants you to be kind to the animals and defensive
from the cruel ones. When the animals pose immediate
threat to your life such as a tiger gets loose
from jungle or a snake takes shelter in your house,
killing them for your safety is not only allowed
but is also encouraged as a pious act. Similarly,
when some animals (e.g. rats, ants and termites)
create hazards for you, you can kill them without
risking sin. Such an animal policy obviously makes
a good compromise between kindness to the animals
and wellbeing of the mankind.