Islamic Thoughts

Defaming Islam: Freedom Of Speech Or Violation Of Rights?

31 : DEFAMING ISLAM: FREEDOM OF SPEECH OR VIOLATION OF RIGHTS?

There have been occasional incidences of defaming Islam through mockery of the Prophet, burning the Quran and so on. The role of the West has been often, though not always, a defensive one for such actions. They tend to defend such actions, citing the right to freedom of speech for those involved.

(i) The position conflicts with the well-accepted political theory that the rights and duties of the social beings are closely interrelated. Mr. X, for example, is able to enjoy his rights because Mr. Y respects his rights and similarly Mr. X has also a moral duty to honor the rights of Mr. Y. Every individual in the society has a boundary for his own rights and this boundary for one man ends where that of the other begins. When you cross your respective boundary, then the rights of others are squeezed.

(ii) To deal with such a situation, every civilized nation insists on sensible use of freedom of speech so that the human rights of others are not endangered. In America, for example, the Constitutional right to speech freedom is not considered absolute, for it does not allow you to falsely shouting 'Fire' for creating stampede in a crowd. Accordingly, you can inject civility in the role of freedom of speech by encouraging its use in promotion of human rights (such as through criticizing the evils of the society or a despotic ruler) and discouraging its use for violation of rights of 1.6 billion Muslims.

(iii) A man of conscience can easily honor the difference between criticizing a human error and falsifying a holy divine institution. A well-intended criticism of a man-made wrong may hurt only the target person but that may bring goodness (through corrective role) for the wider society. By contrast, an untrue expression against a divine truth cannot help the society. Such an act, on the contrary, is likely to be a lightning rod, robbing peace off peaceful society.

(iv) The above defenders (the majority being non-Muslims) could better sense the harmful effects of defaming Islam through a process of empathy--feeling the impact by putting themselves in the position of offended Muslims. They would never feel good if scandals were spread against their Prophet(s). The righteous Muslims would also feel the same way if anyone falsely blames the prophets like Jesus or Moses who are repeatedly named in the Quran as among the holy prophets of Islam.

The above arguments will hopefully appeal to the good sense of the concerned people and accordingly influence their roles in the event of any blasphemous expression against Islam.